Choosing predictive, iterative, incremental, adaptive or hybrid approaches
The Development Approach and Life Cycle Performance Domain addresses how the product, service, or result will be created — and how the project will be structured to deliver it. The choice is fundamental: it shapes governance, stakeholder engagement, planning detail, risk posture, and team behaviour.
Five development approaches sit on a continuum from predictive to adaptive: Predictive (plan-driven, scope-fixed, often called 'waterfall') — best where requirements are stable and the cost of late change is high; Iterative — repeats activities to refine a product (e.g. prototypes); Incremental — delivers successive functional pieces to provide early value; Adaptive (agile) — short cycles, emergent requirements, frequent stakeholder feedback; Hybrid — combinations of the above used pragmatically.
Delivery cadence is a separate choice: single delivery, multiple deliveries, periodic deliveries, or continuous delivery. A predictive approach can still have multiple deliveries; an adaptive approach can still be a single delivery.
Life cycle phases are tailored — typical phases include Feasibility, Design, Build, Test, Deploy, Close — but their existence, sequence, and overlap vary widely.