Performance metrics, earned value, and informed decision-making
The Measurement Performance Domain addresses assessing project performance and taking action to maintain acceptable performance. Effective measurement is purposeful — measures are chosen because they support decision-making, not for their own sake.
Good measures are SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound) and balanced across leading and lagging indicators. PMBOK 8 emphasises both delivery metrics (schedule, cost, scope, quality) and value metrics (outcomes, benefits, stakeholder satisfaction).
Earned Value Management (EVM) integrates scope, schedule, and cost into a single objective performance measurement system. Key formulas: EV (Earned Value) = % complete × BAC; SV (Schedule Variance) = EV − PV; CV (Cost Variance) = EV − AC; SPI (Schedule Performance Index) = EV / PV; CPI (Cost Performance Index) = EV / AC; EAC (Estimate at Completion) = BAC / CPI (or AC + bottom-up ETC). A CPI < 1 means over budget; an SPI < 1 means behind schedule.
Adaptive projects use different metrics: velocity, lead time, cycle time, throughput, escaped defects, and cumulative flow. The right metrics depend on the approach and the questions being asked.
Beware of measurement pitfalls: vanity metrics (look good but don't drive decisions), Goodhart's Law (when a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure), and analysis paralysis.